Experimental ontology on the basis of semasiological experiments
Syncretic Ptolemaic world puzzle – two-dimensional projection of an at least nine-dimensional fractal trialistic scheme of symmetry breaks
or a universal semantics or a panpsychistic and neutral monistic ontology starting from a theory of self-organizing systems (65)
personality
acknowledgment
religion-dignity
Inspiration
individual(can)-individuation
Psychology
medium-communication
Media theory
spirituality
unnameability (god type 1)
absoluteness
nothingness (god type 2)
transzendence-principle
Induction
language-mapping
Epistemoloy
compatibility
coherence
platform-purpose
Emergence
society(must)-socialization
Sociology
spontaneity creativity
resilience fitness
nature-instinct lust
Innovation
community(may)-convention institution
Social psychology
universality-
infinity
Ontology
world-substance (god type 3)
Philosophy
factuality-finiteness
Phenomenology |
|
temporality-process
Genealogy
evolution-selection
History |
quality
order
immanence-fact
Imitation
relativity
item |
quantity
chaos |
intensionality
wisdom
content meaning
sign-category notion
Simulation
extensionality
form
foolishness
arbitrariness |
complementarity
state
estrangement
indifference |
immediacy
harmony
network-binding
Situation
relationality
cohesion |
remoteness
tension |
homogeneity
neutrality
organization-role
Interaction
heterogeneity
partiality |
functionality
interdependence |
authenticity
magnanimity
justice grace
culture-ritual moral
Tradition
expressivity
manipulation
cowardice
disgust |
artificiality
law
cruelty
revengefulness |
truthfulness
openness
truth humility
science-canon dogma
Interpretation
insincerity
sham
resentment
arrogance |
opportuneness
control
corruptness
envy |
stability
resonance
reason-sense
Speculation
being-structure
Aesthetics
ideal(perfection)-idea
Mathematics
organism(flexibility)-life
Biology
totality
wholeness (identity)
attractor-shape
Integration
should-standardization
Synergetics
mass(inertia)-energy
Physics
intentionality naivety
interest serenity
will-project hope
Motivation
wanting-development desire
Dialectic
information(probability)-distinction paradigm
Informatics
subjectivity
simplicity (unity)
wave-i
Synthesis
being-expansion
Statics
self-referentiality
equality (unity)
existence-reflexion
Autopoiesis
becoming-motion
Dynamics
self-determination constructiveness
mindfulness joy
soul-trust love
Autonomy
doing-acting violence
Ethics
emotionality friendliness
intuition pride
feeling-belief worry
Practice
haveing-appropriation rating
Logic
specificity
particle-self
Difference
observability
complicatedness
(uniqueness) |
generality |
certainty
quantum-me
Analysis
uncertainty |
objectivity
complexity
(multiplicity) |
availability
potency-possibility
Inside
foreign-referentiality
contradiction
(multiplicity) |
unavailability |
fortuity
act-reality
Outside
necessity |
causality
contingency
(uniqueness) |
freedom
body-experience anxiety
Powerlessness
adaptivity
frustration
overconformity
repression |
constraint |
consciousness
mind-decision hatred
Omnipotence
unconsciousness |
foreign-determination
aggression
destructiveness
annihilation |
certitude
intellect-knowledge prejudice
Theory
rationality
construction
hostility
contempt |
uncertitude |
concreteness
senses-doubt bias
Empirie
abstractness |
receptivity
irritation
oversensitivity
mortification |
While etymology deals with the origin and meaning of words and their history, including the history of their change in meaning, onomasiology and semasiology investigate the language-internal relationships between words and meanings. Both play an important role within lexicography and are sub-disciplines of general semantics. Onomasiology examines the designation and the change of designation of objects by words depending on different contexts. In contrast, semasiology investigates how words can have different meanings depending on different contexts. As onomasiology deals with word formation and word creation, semasiology explores the possibility of creating new meanings through new assignments of words and contexts. There is thus something magical inherent in semasiology. Words become a kind of incantation to make the world reveal itself.
The relations shown here can also be found in a large number of management and coaching schemas. However, these all have at least the following three additional properties:
- High-dimensional relational relations are reduced to at most two dimensions or folded into at most two-dimensional subspaces.
- Existing power relations are veiled or at least not questioned.
- Through oversimplifying hierarchizations, existing hierarchical structures of power are implicitly legitimized.
Examples: Maslow's hierarchy of needs, Kohlberg's stages of moral development, Loevinger's stages of ego development, Whitehead's social and personal orders, Extended OSI model,ERG theory, Theory U.
Consequently, people lie to each other for the purpose of complexity reduction.
Due to its speculative nature, the scientific usefulness of an experimental ontology is at least uncertain.